Home / Trending / Taylor Swift ‘attempted to sue’ Microsoft over racist chatbot Tay

Taylor Swift ‘attempted to sue’ Microsoft over racist chatbot Tay

Taylor SwiftSymbol copyright
Getty Pictures

Taylor Swift attempted to sue Microsoft over a chatbot which posted racist messages on Twitter, the president of the tech corporate has printed.

Taylor’s attorneys made a transfer on Microsoft in 2016, consistent with a brand new biography by way of its boss Brad Smith.

She was once unsatisfied with the title of its chatbot Tay, intended to have interaction with 18 to 24-year-olds on-line, as it was once very similar to hers.

If you do not bear in mind TayTweets, it is the Twitter chatbot that became racist.

What was once TayTweets?

TayTweets was once managed by way of synthetic intelligence and was once designed to be told from conversations hung on social media.

However in a while after Tay was once introduced, it tweeted to mention it supported genocide and did not imagine the holocaust came about – amongst different issues.

Microsoft issued an apology and took Tay offline after not up to 18-hours of offensive conversations on Twitter.

Taylor Swift’s criminal motion wasn’t about what the chatbot had mentioned on-line, however as an alternative in regards to the similarity to her personal title.

“I used to be on holiday once I made the error of having a look at my telephone all over dinner,” Brad Smith writes in his new e-book, Equipment and Guns, stories the Dad or mum.

Symbol copyright
Getty Pictures

Symbol caption

Brad Smith is the president of Microsoft

“An e-mail had simply arrived from a Beverly Hills attorney who offered himself by way of telling me: ‘We constitute Taylor Swift, on whose behalf that is directed to you.’

“‘The title Tay, as I am certain you should know, is carefully related to our shopper’,” he provides. “No, I in reality did not know, however the e-mail however grabbed my consideration.”

He says the attorney argued that the title Tay violated federal and state rules and “created a false and deceptive affiliation between the preferred singer and our chatbot”.

Taylor’s emblems

Taylor and her criminal workforce are beautiful strict on individuals who come too just about the singer and her highbrow belongings rights.

Her title, signature and initials are already emblems and in 2015 she tried to trademark lyrics from her album, 1989.

Simply ahead of the report was once launched she effectively filed to make sayings like “this unwell beat” and “great to satisfy you, the place you been” emblems.

This made certain she was once the one particular person on the earth in a position to make use of sayings like those on products – and threatened Etsy dealers with criminal motion in 2015 for the use of them on their selfmade merchandise.

Radio 1 Newsbeat has contacted Taylor Swift’s representatives for remark.

Observe Newsbeat on Instagram, Fb, Twitter and YouTube.

Concentrate to Newsbeat are living at 12:45 and 17:45 weekdays – or concentrate again right here.

Taylor SwiftSymbol copyright
Getty Pictures

Taylor Swift attempted to sue Microsoft over a chatbot which posted racist messages on Twitter, the president of the tech corporate has printed.

Taylor’s attorneys made a transfer on Microsoft in 2016, consistent with a brand new biography by way of its boss Brad Smith.

She was once unsatisfied with the title of its chatbot Tay, intended to have interaction with 18 to 24-year-olds on-line, as it was once very similar to hers.

If you do not bear in mind TayTweets, it is the Twitter chatbot that became racist.

What was once TayTweets?

TayTweets was once managed by way of synthetic intelligence and was once designed to be told from conversations hung on social media.

However in a while after Tay was once introduced, it tweeted to mention it supported genocide and did not imagine the holocaust came about – amongst different issues.

Microsoft issued an apology and took Tay offline after not up to 18-hours of offensive conversations on Twitter.

Taylor Swift’s criminal motion wasn’t about what the chatbot had mentioned on-line, however as an alternative in regards to the similarity to her personal title.

“I used to be on holiday once I made the error of having a look at my telephone all over dinner,” Brad Smith writes in his new e-book, Equipment and Guns, stories the Dad or mum.

Symbol copyright
Getty Pictures

Symbol caption

Brad Smith is the president of Microsoft

“An e-mail had simply arrived from a Beverly Hills attorney who offered himself by way of telling me: ‘We constitute Taylor Swift, on whose behalf that is directed to you.’

“‘The title Tay, as I am certain you should know, is carefully related to our shopper’,” he provides. “No, I in reality did not know, however the e-mail however grabbed my consideration.”

He says the attorney argued that the title Tay violated federal and state rules and “created a false and deceptive affiliation between the preferred singer and our chatbot”.

Taylor’s emblems

Taylor and her criminal workforce are beautiful strict on individuals who come too just about the singer and her highbrow belongings rights.

Her title, signature and initials are already emblems and in 2015 she tried to trademark lyrics from her album, 1989.

Simply ahead of the report was once launched she effectively filed to make sayings like “this unwell beat” and “great to satisfy you, the place you been” emblems.

This made certain she was once the one particular person on the earth in a position to make use of sayings like those on products – and threatened Etsy dealers with criminal motion in 2015 for the use of them on their selfmade merchandise.

Radio 1 Newsbeat has contacted Taylor Swift’s representatives for remark.

Observe Newsbeat on Instagram, Fb, Twitter and YouTube.

Concentrate to Newsbeat are living at 12:45 and 17:45 weekdays – or concentrate again right here.

About admin

Check Also

Photo shows Justin Trudeau wearing brownface at 2001 party

Picture presentations Justin Trudeau dressed in brownface at 2001 birthday party

Canadian High Minister Justin TrudeauJustin Pierre James TrudeauOur remaining best possible probability of redemption: Why …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *